Purple gaze, all in my brain
Lately things they don't seem the same
Actin' funny, but I don't know why
Excuse me while I kiss the sky
We are what we think.
All that we are arises with our thoughts.
With our thoughts we make the world.
BuddhaPurple gaze, all around
The Dharmapada
Don't know if I'm comin' up or down
Am I happy or in misery?
What ever it is, that girl put a spell on me
detail
A Person Looks At A Work Of Art/
someone looks at something...
LOGOS/HA HAHelp me
Help me
Oh, no, no
Ooo, ahhh
Ooo, ahhh
Ooo, ahhh
Ooo, ahhh, yeah!
Purple gaze all in my eyes
Don't know if it's day or night
You got me blowin', blowin' my mind
Is it tomorrow, or just the end of time?
Ooo
Help me
Ahh, yea-yeah, purple gaze
Oh, no, oh
Oh, help me
Tell me, tell me, purple gaze
I can't go on like this
Purple gaze
You're makin' me blow my mind
Purple gaze, n-no, nooo
Purple gaze
- with apologies to JH
___________________________________________
We have received the following email announcement from the Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney : Question the post-critical irony
How do we distinguish between an ‘original’ and a ‘copy’?
Professor of Art History at Monash University, Rex Butler
takes a look at the practice of two painters making similar
work for two very different reasons. Explore the theories
|
Clicking on that takes us to this : |
TALK
WHY PAINTING?
– Rex Butler
Explore the recent history, current state and the possible futures of painting in this series of talks.
REALLY POST-CRITICAL
Rex Butler (Monash University)
Sat 26 September
2-3.30pm
Sat 26 September
2-3.30pm
The Brisbane-based newspaper The Courier-Mail recently carried a long article by journalist Susan Johnson, 'CJ Hendry shows how artists are finding fame and riches by using social media' (Read article here) (December 15, 2014), featuring the work of one CJ Hendry, an artist whose work bears an uncanny resemblance to that of another Queensland artist Michael Zavros. Painter Zavros is known for his “post-critical” attitude towards art-making, his doing away with that critical “irony” that distinguishes the work of art from that object or attitude it appears to represent. Zavros’ work simply is what it represents: cars, handsome young men, the artist narcissistically bathing in his own wealth and glamour. And yet Zavros and his dealer in the article are quoted defending his work against its imitation by Hendry. In what could the difference between the two bodies of work lie? How are we to distinguish between Zavros’ “original” and Hendry’s “copy”? And why would Zavros, given his apparently “post-critical” attitude, want to?
Rex Butler is Professor of Art History at Monash University. He is currently working on a history of UnAustralian art with ADS Donaldson and has recently completed a book on Deleuze and Guattari’s What is Philosophy?
FREE, bookings essential
Veolia Lecture Theatre
Veolia Lecture Theatre
Presented in association with Sydney College of the Arts, University of Sydney
Image Credit: Lucy Parahkina
A Person Looks At A Work Of Art/
someone looks at something...
LOGOS/HA HA
Theatre of the Actors of Regard
detailA Person Looks At A Work Of Art/
someone looks at something...
LOGOS/HA HA